In developing and transition economies, the combined effect of decentralization and urbanization has increased demand on local governments to provide and
finance public services. Against this background, tight fiscal policies have constrained budgetary transfers from central to local governments. Competing claims for scarce budgetary resources have resulted in large funding gaps for local infrastructure investments. Private capital will be required if local services are to be brought to minimum standards that support growing urban demand. Local capability to shoulder the expanded responsibilities and, in particular, mobilize the required resources is contingent upon the existence of an adequate regulatory and fiscal framework for decentralization which requires, most importantly, that: (i) responsibilities for service delivery be clearly assigned among government tiers; (ii) capacity for own-source revenue generation (local taxes and user charges) be enhanced; and (iii) net flows (tax sharing and transfers) from central to local governments be rationalized and made predictable.
Download Here
Lebanon – Power Sector and the Power of Politics
I – Introduction
Read more
لبنان – نحو نظام تقاعد منصف ومستدام لجميع اللبنانيين
Read more
Lebanon – Towards a Fair, Equitable
and Sustainable Pension Scheme
Read more
and Sustainable Pension Scheme
The Unremitting Exodus of Syrian Nationals to Lebanon and the Specter of a Permanent Settlement
For a National Salvation Policy that Upholds Humanitarian Standards and Protects the Homeland
(*Note: Refugees, displaced or others? In keeping with the conventional terms used in media and politics, this note refers to Syrian nationals present in Lebanon interchangeably as “displaced” or “refugees”. Neither however is the right term as under international law: (i) “Displaced” are those who forcibly relocate to (safer) areas within their own country, which is not the case of Syrians moving to Lebanon; while (ii) “Refugees” are those who cross the national border and claim a special status involving assistance and protection in, and guarantee against deportation from, the host country inter alia under the terms of the 1951 UN Convention and the ensuing 1967 Special Protocol. As Lebanon is no party to that convention, it is under no legal obligation – let alone that it would be national suicide given the massive flow of arrivals – to confer “refugee” status to any vulnerable group settling on its soil. This note submits that the proper term would be “Migrant” – a blend of economic emigration which, as the note argues, is increasingly what the Syrian exodus to Lebanon is turning into, and flight from dire conditions prevailing in the country of origin.)
5. An independent, objective impact assessment. The Lebanese authorities, jointly with the World Bank and the United Nations, carried out an assessment of the multi-faceted economic consequences of the Syrian crisis, with the aim inter alia to improve the flow and effectiveness of the international community’s support to Lebanon in dealing with, and hopefully sharing in the burden of, this major crisis. In assessing the impact and cost of the crisis, the assessment looked at both the short and longer-term development aspects, with a focus on: (i) the effect of the conflict on economic output (GDP); and (ii) the state’s eroding capacity for service delivery and the programs needed to keep up with ever growing demand in education, health and infrastructure, and the ensuing public finance (budgetary) implications.
Samir Khalil El Daher
June 2014
For a National Salvation Policy that Upholds Humanitarian Standards and Protects the Homeland
في إسْتِمْرارِ تَدَفُّقِ الرَعايا السورييِّن إلى لبنانَ وخَطَرِ تَحَوُّلِه إلى نُزوحٍ دونَ عَوْدَة
أينَ وإلامَ سياسة لبنانَ من هذه “القضية”؟ لسياسةٍ تُراعي المَعاييرَ الإنسانية وتَحْمي الوَطَن
1. هل مُقَدَّرٌ على لبنانَ أن يكونَ أبداً مخيماً إقليمياً لّلاجئين؟وهل على اللبنانيين الإنتظار كَي يُعيدَ التاريخُ نفسَه؟ لقد دَخَلَتْ أحداثُ سوريا عامَها الرابع وشعبُها يُعاني من دوَّامةِ عنفٍ ورعبٍ ودمارٍ دَفَعَت بملايينِ من أبنائِه الى النزوحِ إلى مناطقَ أكثرَ أماناً داخل وطنِهم، او اللجوء إلى بلدانِ الجوارِ ومنها لبنان. وسريعاً ما ولَّى الإعتقادُ السائدُ في بدايةِ الأزمةِ أن عددَ الوافدين إلى لبنانَ سيكون قليلاً وفترةَ اقامتِهم قصيرةً. فتحوَّلَت التوقعاتُ إذ يوجدُ حالياً مليون نازحٍ(*)مسجَّلين رسمياً في لبنان، إضافةً إلى غير المسجَّلين المقيمين مع أسرٍ لبنانية من معارفَ وأقرِباء، ناهيك عن العددِ الوافر من السورييِّن العاملين أصلاً في لبنان ومِنهُم من يستضيف مزيداً من عابري الحدود ما يرفع، بالتقديِراتِ الرسميةِ، عددَ الرعايا السوريين في لبنانَ إلى 1,3مليون، أي ما يوازي ثُلْثَ المواطنين اللبنانيين المقيمين، فيما تتنامى أعدادُ الوافدينَ بوتيرةٍ عاليةٍ ومُنْتَظِمَةٍ تناهز يومياً ألفي طلب تسجيلٍ ، أي ما فوق الخمسِين ألفاً شهرياً.
Read more
أينَ وإلامَ سياسة لبنانَ من هذه "القضية"؟ لسياسةٍ تُراعي المَعاييرَ الإنسانية وتَحْمي الوَطَن
Transport, Water and Urban Development
INTRODUCTION
Read more
ملاحظات حول البنية التحتية قطاع التنمية المُدنية
أساسيات بناء نظام مالي للحكم المحلي
المقدمة
1 .في كثير من البلدان، تتزايد وتيرة اللامركزية في منظومة المسؤوليات المناطة لتوفيروتمويل الخدمات العامة. وفي الاقتصادات الناشئة والنامية، غالباً ما يعاني الدور الموسع للحكومة المحلية فيتقديم الخدماتمن عدم توفر مواردمالية كافية، بالاضافة الى ضعف القدرات المؤسسيةلا سيما من حيثعدم الكفايةالماليةوالممارسات والإدارةوالمعرفة. وفي هذا الاطار،تستعرض هذه المذكرةمجموعة واسعة منالمؤشرات المرتبطة بوجود نظام مالي سليم للحكومة المحلية، بما في ذلك قدرةالحكومية المحلية وإمكانياتها للوصول إلىأسواق رأس المال في القطاع الخاصعلى نحويتوافق مع تحقيقاستقرار الاقتصاد الكلي وأهداف السياسة العامة.
2.لهذا الغرض،تحدد هذه المذكرة أساسيات تحقيق المرونة في مالية الحكومات المحلية، والعناصر الرئيسية التي تستند اليها الجدارة الائتمانية، والتي بدورها تساعد على تقييمها من قبل الجهات المعنية في السوق. إن القضايا الرئيسيةفي هذا الصددترتبط بما يلي:تعزيز الإطارالتنظيميوالقدرة المؤسسية المحلية من اجل تعزيز كفاءة تقديم الخدمات، وتحسينالعلاقات المالية في ما بين الحكومات المحلية، ونظمالميزانية والمراقبة، وتعزيز الإدارة الماليةالمحلية والقدرة على تعبئة الموارد الخاصةللبنية التحتية في المناطق.كما تتناول المذكرةالربط بين كيفية تمويل الحكومة المحلية وقضايا أوسع في سوق رأس المال، فضلا عندور الوسطاءالمتخصصةفيتمويل البنية التحتيةالمحلية.
Read more
أساسيات بناء نظام مالي للحكم المحلي
Specialized Financial Intermediaries for Local Governments
A Market-based Tool for Local Infrastructure Finance
In developing and transition economies, the combined effect of decentralization and urbanization has increased demand on local governments to provide and
finance public services. Against this background, tight fiscal policies have constrained budgetary transfers from central to local governments. Competing claims for scarce budgetary resources have resulted in large funding gaps for local infrastructure investments. Private capital will be required if local services are to be brought to minimum standards that support growing urban demand. Local capability to shoulder the expanded responsibilities and, in particular, mobilize the required resources is contingent upon the existence of an adequate regulatory and fiscal framework for decentralization which requires, most importantly, that: (i) responsibilities for service delivery be clearly assigned among government tiers; (ii) capacity for own-source revenue generation (local taxes and user charges) be enhanced; and (iii) net flows (tax sharing and transfers) from central to local governments be rationalized and made predictable.
Download Here
A Market-based Tool for Local Infrastructure Finance
Municipal Bond Markets Prospects
for Developing Countries
Against a background of fiscal restraint, governments in developing countries have come to realize that private resources must be mobilized to support the growing demand for infrastructure services. One way is through privatizations and concessions for private provision of infrastructure services which are taking place at a growing pace. Decisions for the provision of these services are also being increasingly decentralized with municipalities playing a growing role in forging partnerships with financiers, operators and constituents. Municipal governments seek to fund capital investments and cover operating costs through local taxes and user charges and, as available, central government transfers. Where essential services—that are not provided through private operations—cannot be funded by current revenues, the financing gap that emerges would have to be filled through borrowings. In many developing countries, local government borrowings have largely been confined to loans from commercial banks or specialized financial institutions, often with central government guarantees.
Download Here
for Developing Countries
The Building Blocks of a Sound
Local Government Finance System
In many countries, the responsibilities for the provision and financing of public services are being increasingly decentralized. In transition and developing economies, the expanded local government role in service delivery is often hindered by limited financial resources, as well as weak institutional capacity particularly in terms of inadequate financial, practices, management and know-how. In this context, this note reviews the broad range of parameters pertaining to a sound local government finance system, including local government capacity and potential to access private capital markets in a way consistent with macroeconomic stability and policy objectives.
Download Here
Local Government Finance System